|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 322-326
Placental weight and perinatal outcome among parturients at a university teaching hospital in Lagos, Nigeria
Chidinma Magnus Nwogu1, Imoleayo E Adetuyi1, Kehinde Sharafadeen Okunade2, Gbemisola Eniola Osanyin2, Ayodeji Ayotunde Oluwole2
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
|Date of Web Publication||11-Feb-2019|
Dr. Chidinma Magnus Nwogu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, PMB 12003, Lagos
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: The growth and survival of the fetus are essentially dependent on formation, full development, and functions of the placenta. Examination of the placenta would demonstrate important information about whatever has happened to the fetus in utero.
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the sociodemographic characteristics that affect placenta weight and then assess the association between placental weight and perinatal outcome among parturients in a tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective review of all women who delivered at the labor ward complex of the hospital between January 2014 and December 2015. The data of all parturients with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies were obtained from the labor ward register, and their case notes were subsequently retrieved from the medical records department for extraction of all relevant information. Descriptive statistics were computed for all data and analyses were done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 22.0 for Windows (manufactured by IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). The associations between groups of continuous variables were tested using the independent sample t-test or one-way analysis of variance where applicable. All significances were reported at P < 0.05.
Conclusion: Parity, maternal booking weight, gestational age at delivery, baby's birth weight, umbilical cord length, and neonatal 5-min Apgar score had positive correlations with placental weight. Further longitudinal studies are needed to examine the extent to which placental weight will affect the future growth and development, nutritional status, and health of newborns.
Result: The overall mean cord length was 59.6±11.7cm and the mean placental weight was 657.5±96.1 grams with majority (46.3%) of the parturients having normal placental weight range of 500-749 grams. Placental weights at term have statistically significant positive correlations with the gestational age at delivery (P = 0.041), baby's birth weights (P = 0.003), 5-minute Apgar score (P = 0.016), and the umbilical cord length (P = 0.035).
Keywords: Baby's weight; maternal booking weight; parity; placental weight.
|How to cite this article:|
Nwogu CM, Adetuyi IE, Okunade KS, Osanyin GE, Oluwole AA. Placental weight and perinatal outcome among parturients at a university teaching hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;35:322-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Nwogu CM, Adetuyi IE, Okunade KS, Osanyin GE, Oluwole AA. Placental weight and perinatal outcome among parturients at a university teaching hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Jun 19];35:322-6. Available from: http://www.tjogonline.com/text.asp?2018/35/3/322/251959
| Introduction|| |
The growth and survival of the fetus are essentially dependent on formation, full development, and functions of the placenta. The placenta undergoes different changes in weight, volume, structure, shape, and function continuously throughout the gestation to support the prenatal life. The placenta is a unique organ to mammals which connects the developing fetus to the uterine wall. It is the most important organ for maintaining and continuing healthy pregnancy. It transfers and exchanges oxygen and nutrition needed for the fetus. The placenta, “the life of the fetus in utero,” functions diversely to support the growth of the fetus and interacts with the two individuals, the mother and the developing fetus. It is the most accurate record of the infant's prenatal experiences.
The placenta plays a vital role in normal fetal development, and failure of the placenta to gain weight and insufficiency of its function can result in fetal disorders. Examination of the placenta would demonstrate important information about whatever has happened to the fetus in utero. Increase in placental size is significantly associated with maternal weight, and it is an independent predictor of birth weight. Placental weight reflects placental development and functions and is correlated with maternal age, gestational age, history of maternal diabetes, preeclampsia, birth weight, route of delivery, infants' gender and Apgar score, and fetal distress. Other factors influencing placental weight include parity, maternal height and weight, and serum ferritin concentration.,,,,
A knowledge of the mean weight of the placenta in Nigerians and a determination of its impact on perinatal outcome would have an important implication for infants care and decision-making in obstetrics. This study will, therefore, aim to determine the sociodemographic characteristics that affect placenta weight and then assess the association between placental weight and perinatal outcome among parturients in a tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Study design and setting
This was a retrospective review of all women who delivered at the labor ward complex of a University Teaching Hospital in Lagos, Nigeria, between January 2014 and December 2015.
The data of all parturients with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies who delivered were obtained from the labor ward register, and their case notes were subsequently retrieved from the medical records department for extraction of all relevant information. Extracted information included sociodemographic characteristics of the women (age, parity, booking status, and booking weight) and their delivery outcome (mode of delivery, 5 min-Apgar score, umbilical cord length, neonatal birth weight, neonatal birth status, and fetal gender). Excluded from the study were women with unknown gestational age and those with preexisting or newly diagnosed medical conditions in pregnancy.
Descriptive statistics were computed for all data and analyses were done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 22.0 for Windows (manufactured by IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). All the quantitative data were tested for normality of distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test. The associations between groups of continuous variables were tested using the independent sample t-test or one-way analysis of variance where applicable. All significances were reported at P < 0.05.
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the hospital's Health Research and Ethics Committee of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital before the commencement of the study.
| Results|| |
The case notes of 750 eligible women were successfully retrieved for the study. The age range of the parturients was 19–43 years and the mean age was 32.5 ± 4.3 years. Majority of the women (82.5%) were booked and the mean booking weight was 70.3 ± 15.5 kg with the largest proportion (49.6%) of the women weighing between 50 and 69 kg [Table 1].
As shown in [Table 2], an almost equal proportion of the women delivered vaginally and by cesarean section during the review period. Majority of the newborns were delivered at term (93.6%) with a mean gestational age of 37.7 ± 3.6 weeks. Most of the neonates (63.3%) were of average birth weight with an overall mean birth weight of 3.3 ± 0.4 kg. Almost all of the deliveries (97.9%) resulted in live births with the largest proportion of these neonates (97.7%) having an optimal 5-min Apgar score of ≥7. There were more male neonates (54.4%) than females delivered during the review period. The overall mean cord length was 59.6 ± 11.7 cm. In [Figure 1], the mean placental weight was 657.5 ± 96.1 g with the majority (46.3%) of the parturients having normal placental weight range of 500–749 g.
|Figure 1: Distribution of parturients by categories of placental weights (mean weight of 657.5 ± 96.1 g)|
Click here to view
On analyses of the association between placental weights and the parturients' sociodemographic characteristics [Table 3], we found a positive trend for placental weight and parity (P = 0.006) and maternal booking weight (P = 0.035). There were no such relationships observed with maternal age (P = 0.515) and booking status (P = 0.229).
|Table 3: Placental weights and sociodemographic characteristics of parturients|
Click here to view
In [Table 4], the placental weights at term were shown to have statistically significant positive correlations with the gestational age at delivery (P = 0.041), baby's birth weights (P = 0.003), 5-min Apgar score (P = 0.016), and the umbilical cord length (P = 0.035). There were, however, no statistically significant associations between placental weights and mode of delivery (P = 0.077), neonatal gender (P = 0.720), and neonatal birth status (P = 0.592).
| Discussion|| |
The placental mean weight of 658 ± 96 g reported in this study was greater than the mean weights obtained in large studies from the US (447 ± 92 g) and Iran (530 ± 113 g), but lower than the mean weight of 711 ± 156 g reported in a Norwegian cohort. The weight is also slightly higher than the mean of 590 ± 82 g obtained in a similar Nigerian study carried out in the North-Western part of the country. These findings highlighted the important variations in placental weights based on the geographical, racial, nutritional, and genetic characteristics of the different study locations. The mean umbilical cord length in this study (59.6 ± 11.7 cm) is comparable to the average umbilical cord length of 57.48 cm found in another Nigerian study carried out in a similar group of parturients.
The age range of 18–35 years is regarded as the period of optimal physiological adaptation to pregnancy, and this can explain why the mean placental weight of women in this age group was greater than that of women in the other age group categories in this study, even though we found no statistically significant relationship between maternal age and placental weight. This may be because, in the older women (≥35 years of age), the physiological changes of aging due to reduced compliance of the blood vessels with subsequent rise in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure may prevent the development of a totally healthy pregnancy and placenta.
Our study reported a positive linear correlation between parity and placental weight. This proportional increase in placental weight with increasing parity is in agreement with the previous reports that the placentae and babies from multiparous women from 32 weeks onward are heavier than those from primiparous women.,, We also found that there is an increase placental weight in relation to increase in the maternal booking weight. This linear association between increasing maternal weight (or body mass index) in categories and placental weight was convincingly illustrated in the previous studies carried out in Scotland  and the Netherlands.
Gestational age is a known determinant factor of placental weight, and this was corroborated by our study where we found a statistically significant relationship between the gestational age at delivery and mean weight of the placenta. Molteni et al. have shown that the average placental weight is related to the gestational age. They stated that placental weight increases in infants proportionately with gestational age; however, in sharp variation to these findings, Lo et al. have reported that there is no significant difference between placental weight and gestational age.
The placenta is essential for normal fetal development and failure of the placenta can result in fetal problems including fetal growth restriction and fetal distress at birth., We found a significant positive association between the weight of the placenta and improved Apgar score at birth in correlation to a previous Iranian study by Asgharnia et al. Even though our study reported a higher mean placental weight in the male fetuses, we did not demonstrate any statistically significant relationship between placental weight and the fetal sex in contrast to other previous studies that reported that the male fetuses gain significantly greater weight when compared to their female counterparts.,,
Placental weight increase in this study also showed a positive relationship with the baby's birth weight. Similar findings have been reported in the previous studies.,,,,, These studies considered placental weight as a determinant of fetal growth in addition to the maternal factors because the placenta is believed to play a major role in fetal nutrition and fetal growth as nutrients from the maternal circulation need to be transported across the placenta to reach the fetal circulation., Limitations to this study include lack of reliable data on all deliveries that took place during the review period due to poor medical record-keeping system in the hospital. Placental weight measurements may be subjected to some interobserver errors.
| Conclusion|| |
We found in our study that parity, maternal booking weight, gestational age at delivery, baby's birth weight, umbilical cord length, and neonatal 5-min Apgar score had positive correlations with placental weight. Critical examination of the placenta and umbilical cord immediately after delivery can, therefore, be used to determine the well-being of the baby as suboptimal placental weight and is significantly associated with some adverse pregnancy outcomes. Further longitudinal studies are, however, needed to examine the extent to which placental weight will affect the future growth and development, nutritional status, and health of newborns.
The authors appreciate the assistance given by the medical record staff of the teaching hospital and the resident doctors of the department of obstetrics and gynecology.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Roberts JM, Cooper DW. Pathogenesis and genetics of pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2001;357:53-6.
Asgharnia M, Esmailpour N, Poorghorban M, Atrkar-Roshan Z. Placental weight and its association with maternal and neonatal characteristics. Acta Med Iran 2008;46:467-72.
Madkar C, Musale J, Deshpande H, Shitole R. A study of placental weight and birth weight ratio (Pw/Bw) and its effects on perinatal outcome. Indian J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;2:1-6.
Thame M, Osmond C, Wilks RJ, Bennett FI, McFarlane-Anderson N, Forrester TE, et al.
Blood pressure is related to placental volume and birth weight. Hypertension 2000;35:662-7.
Heinonen S, Taipale P, Saarikoski S. Weights of placentae from small-for-gestational age infants revisited. Placenta 2001;22:399-404.
Hindmarsh PC, Geary MP, Rodeck CH, Jackson MR, Kingdom JC. Effect of early maternal iron stores on placental weight and structure. Lancet 2000;356:719-23.
Perry IJ, Beevers DG, Whincup PH, Bareford D. Predictors of ratio of placental weight to fetal weight in multiethnic community. BMJ 1995;310:436-9.
Godfrey KM, Redman CW, Barker DJ, Osmond C. The effect of maternal anaemia and iron deficiency on the ratio of fetal weight to placental weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:886-91.
Baptiste-Roberts K, Salafia CM, Nicholson WK, Duggan A, Wang NY, Brancati FL, et al.
Gross placental measures and childhood growth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:13-23.
Roland MC, Friis CM, Voldner N, Godang K, Bollerslev J, Haugen G, et al.
Fetal growth versus birthweight: The role of placenta versus other determinants. PLoS One 2012;7:e39324.
Panti AA, Ekele BA, Nwobodo EI, Yakubu A. The relationship between the weight of the placenta and birth weight of the neonate in a Nigerian hospital. Niger Med J 2012;53:80-4. [Full text]
Njokanma OF, Sule-Odu OA. Intrauterine growth retardation in Nigerian neonates. Trop J Obstet Gynecol 1998;15:25-9.
Agboola A. The placenta, umbilical cord and membranes. In: Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynecology for Medical Students. 2nd
ed. Ibadan, Nigeria: Heinemann Educational Books; 2006. p. 267-71.
Emuveyan E. Normal physiology of pregnancy. In: Comprehensive Obstetrics in the Tropics. 1st
ed. Accra, Ghana: Asante and Hittscher Printing Press Ltd.; 2002. p. 32.
Roland MC, Friis CM, Godang K, Bollerslev J, Haugen G, Henriksen T, et al.
Maternal factors associated with fetal growth and birthweight are independent determinants of placental weight and exhibit differential effects by fetal sex. PLoS One 2014;9:e87303.
Wallace JM, Bhattacharya S, Horgan GW. Gestational age, gender and parity specific centile charts for placental weight for singleton deliveries in Aberdeen, UK. Placenta 2013;34:269-74.
Kloosterman GJ. Intrauterine growth: The significance of prenatal care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1970;8:895-912.
Wallace JM, Horgan GW, Bhattacharya S. Placental weight and efficiency in relation to maternal body mass index and the risk of pregnancy complications in women delivering singleton babies. Placenta 2012;33:611-8.
L'Abée C, Vrieze I, Kluck T, Erwich JJ, Stolk RP, Sauer PJ, et al.
Parental factors affecting the weights of the placenta and the offspring. J Perinat Med 2011;39:27-34.
Kinare AS, Natekar AS, Chinchwadkar MC, Yajnik CS, Coyaji KJ, Fall CH, et al.
Low midpregnancy placental volume in rural Indian women: A cause for low birth weight? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:443-8.
Molteni RA, Stys SJ, Battaglia FC. Relationship of fetal and placental weight in human beings: Fetal/placental weight ratios at various gestational ages and birth weight distributions. J Reprod Med 1978;21:327-34.
Lo YF, Jeng MJ, Lee YS, Soong WJ, Hwang B. Placental weight and birth characteristics of healthy singleton newborns. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 2002;43:21-5.
Hsieh TT, Hsu JJ, Chen CJ, Chiu TH, Liou JD, Hsieh CC, et al.
Analysis of birth weight and gestational age in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 1991;90:382-7.
Voldner N, Frøslie KF, Bo K, Haakstad L, Hoff C, Godang K, et al.
Modifiable determinants of fetal macrosomia: Role of lifestyle-related factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:423-9.
Friis CM, Qvigstad E, Paasche Roland MC, Godang K, Voldner N, Bollerslev J, et al.
Newborn body fat: Associations with maternal metabolic state and placental size. PLoS One 2013;8:e57467.
Clausen T, Burski TK, Øyen N, Godang K, Bollerslev J, Henriksen T, et al.
Maternal anthropometric and metabolic factors in the first half of pregnancy and risk of neonatal macrosomia in term pregnancies. A prospective study. Eur J Endocrinol 2005;153:887-94.
Voldner N, Froslie KF, Godang K, Bollerslev J, Henriksen T. Determinants of birth weight in boys and girls. Hum Ontogenet 2013;3:7-12.
Baumann MU, Deborde S, Illsley NP. Placental glucose transfer and fetal growth. Endocrine 2002;19:13-22.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]