|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 224-228
Elective abdominal hysterectomy: Appraisal of indications and complications at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital – An 8-year review
A Rabiu1, R Habib2
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bayero University Kano, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
2 Department of Obsterics and Gynaecology, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
|Date of Web Publication||23-Nov-2017|
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bayero University Kano, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, PMB 3011, Kano
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Hysterectomy is a safe and a major gynecological operation. It could be performed using abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic approach. It is performed for different indications such as dysfunctional uterine bleeding, endometriosis, fibroids, or prolapse. This procedure is however not without complications especially in resource-poor countries. An overview of the outcome of the procedure is essential in facilities like ours that is located in resource-poor countries.
Objectives: To determine the rate, indications, and complications of elective abdominal hysterectomy at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (AKTH), Kano, Nigeria.
Methodology: This was a retrospective study of all cases of elective abdominal hysterectomies performed over an 8-year period (January 2009 to December 2016) at AKTH, Kano. Outcome measures were demographic characteristics, indication for surgery, type of hysterectomy, and postoperative complications.
Results: During the period of study, there were 7632 major gynecological operations, among them were 251 cases of elective abdominal hysterectomy, giving a rate of 3.3%. The most common indication was uterine fibroid (51.8%). Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) was more commonly performed (93.0%) compared to subtotal hysterectomy (7.0%). Postoperative pyrexia (45.9%) was the most common complication, while ureteric injury (2.4%) was the least. Duration of hospital stay was 6–10 days in 89.2% of cases, and there was no mortality recorded.
Conclusion: Elective abdominal hysterectomy is a fairly common and safe procedure in AKTH. Uterine fibroid and postoperative pyrexia was the most common indication and complication, respectively. TAH was commonly performed compared to subtotal hysterectomy.
Keywords: Abdominal hysterectomy; complications; indications; Kano.
|How to cite this article:|
Rabiu A, Habib R. Elective abdominal hysterectomy: Appraisal of indications and complications at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital – An 8-year review. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2017;34:224-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Rabiu A, Habib R. Elective abdominal hysterectomy: Appraisal of indications and complications at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital – An 8-year review. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 May 26];34:224-8. Available from: http://www.tjogonline.com/text.asp?2017/34/3/224/219062
| Introduction|| |
Hysterectomy is a major gynecological operation for the removal of the uterus with or without adnexal structures for therapeutic purpose., History of hysterectomy is long and varied. Although significant advances in the techniques of hysterectomy did not occur until the 19th century, earlier attempts are known. Some references to hysterectomy date back to 5th century BC, in the time of Hippocrates. In 1600, Schenck of Grabenberg cataloged 26 cases of vaginal hysterectomy in Europe.
Globally, over 100,000 hysterectomies are performed annually in England and 600,000 in the United States., Hysterectomies are commonly performed in many tertiary health institutions in Nigeria. It accounts for 28% of all major gynecological operations at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, coming after salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy while at University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, the rate of total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) was 10.0%. In developed countries, hysterectomy is accepted readily due to increased awareness of the procedure and longevity; the case is however very different in developing countries like ours, where there is a strong aversion to hysterectomy for reasons of fear of surgery, loss of feminity, loss of sex drive, and sexual rejection by their spouses., Other reasons include cultural beliefs or religious attachment to preservation of menstruation, childbearing, and reincarnating without uterus.,,
There are different routes to access the uterus. These include abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and a combination of vaginal and laparoscopic (laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy).,
The most common indication for hysterectomy in our environment remains uterine fibroid.,,, Other indications for hysterectomy irrespective of the environment include, but not limited to, benign, premalignant, malignant gynecological conditions, and obstetric complications. Abdominal hysterectomy is the removal of the uterus through an abdominal incision. It can be total in which case the uterus and cervix are removed, or subtotal (supracervical), when the cervix is preserved.
All large-scale surveys of hysterectomies show that 70%–80% hysterectomies are performed by abdominal approach except in utero vaginal prolapse for which vaginal route is normally used and accounts for 10% of all cases of hysterectomies.,
Vaginal hysterectomy is the removal of the uterus and cervix through the vagina. It offers great potential in terms of access to the uterus and fulfills all criteria for minimally invasive surgery; it employs a natural orifice thereby avoiding an abdominal scar., The procedure is associated with less postoperative pain, blood loss, less risk for trauma to adjoining structures, less hospital stay, and early return to normal activities. However, the greatest challenge is where the uterine size is >12 weeks.,,,,
More recently, the laparoscopic procedures, laparoscopic hysterectomy, and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy were introduced and are gaining grounds in developed countries. In laparoscopic hysterectomy, the uterine vessels are ligated, coagulated, or stapled through the laparoscope, and the uterus is morcellated or brought out through a colpotomy while in laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, the uterine vessels are ligated vaginally.,, Scientific evidence favors vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies when compared to abdominal hysterectomy. This is not unconnected to the lower complication rates, less postoperative pain, and a rapid return to normal activities, following vaginal or laparoscopically assisted hysterectomies, thereby resulting in a better quality of life.
Absolute and relative contraindications have been proposed for each type of hysterectomy. Each route has its own merits and demerits. The route chosen should be individualized taking into consideration, the surgeon's technical expertise, the indication for the surgery, general health condition of the patients, and facilities available.,, The preponderance of preoperative details such as prophylactic antibiotics and prevention of thromboembolic conditions are important to assure a good surgical outcome.,
Early hysterectomies were associated with morbidities and mortalities mainly from hemorrhage and infections. However, improvement in blood bank services, use of potent antibiotics, and safe anesthetic techniques have dramatically reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with hysterectomy.,, Majority of women have relief of their symptoms after hysterectomy with associated high level of satisfaction after the procedure; however, hysterectomy is not without complications., Recognized complications include immediate complications such as anesthetic complications, injuries to adjoining structures such as urinary bladder, bowel, ureters, and hemorrhage., These complications could lead to severe morbidity and even death. These complications are more frequently encountered in abdominal hysterectomy when compared with vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies.,,
Aims and objectives
To determine the rate, indications, and complications of elective abdominal hysterectomy at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (AKTH), Kano.
| Methodology|| |
This was a retrospective descriptive study of all the elective abdominal hysterectomies that were performed from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2016, at AKTH, Kano. The operation theater records were reviewed, and the case files of these patients were retrieved from the Medical Records Department. Information extracted included age, parity, level of education, occupation, total number and type of hysterectomy, indications, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and length of postoperative hospital stay. The information retrieved was recorded on pro forma for the study. The data collected were recorded in tabular form and presented as frequencies and percentages using computer software SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., IL, USA).
| Results|| |
During the study period (from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2016), there were 7632 major gynecological operations; among them were 251 cases of elective abdominal hysterectomy, giving a rate of 3.3% of all major gynecological operations for elective abdominal hysterectomy. Two hundred and fifty-one cases of hysterectomy were performed during the study period. Only 158 case notes were retrieved from the medical records for analysis, giving a retrieval rate of 62.9%.
The sociodemographic characteristics of the patients are shown in [Table 1]. The highest frequency of elective abdominal hysterectomy was found among 40–49 years of age group (48.7%) and those that are primipara/multipara (58.9%). The rate of elective abdominal hysterectomy was 39.9% and 53.8% among those with primary school education and homemakers, respectively.
|Table 1: Sociodemographic variables of patients who had hysterectomy (n=158)|
Click here to view
The most common indication for elective abdominal hysterectomy in this study was uterine fibroid (51.8%) while the least was chronic pelvic pain (0.6%) [Table 2].
TAH accounted for 93.0% of cases, while subtotal hysterectomy for 7.0% [Table 3].
Postoperative pyrexia (45.9%) was the most common complication, followed by wound infection (18.9%) and intraoperative hemorrhage (12.9%). Ureteric injuries (2.4%) were the least [Table 4].
|Table 4: Postoperative complications among patients who had abdominal hysterectomy (n=85)|
Click here to view
Length of hospital stay was 6–10 days in 89.2% of cases, 7.6% stayed 11–15 days, and 1.3% stayed for more than 16 days [Table 5]. There was no mortality recorded during the period under review.
|Table 5: Length of hospital stay of patients who had elective abdominal hysterectomy (n=158)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The rate of elective abdominal hysterectomy in this study was 3.3% which was lower than the 10.0% reported by Omokanye et al. in Ilorin, and 18.2% reported by Anzaku and Musa in Jos. This is partly attributed to the general aversion to hysterectomy in the northern part of Nigeria, especially in Kano. Poor understanding of its benefits especially in the prevention of cervical cancer and the recurrence of uterine fibroids might have contributed to the low rate.
Elective abdominal hysterectomy is the most common among 40–49 years age group, and this is similar to the experience from other centers.,, This group of women (40-49 years) are more likely multiparous and have completed their family size, hence the need for elective abdominal hysterectomy. Majority of the women were of parity 1–4; 93 (58.9%) grand multiparous constituted 38.6%. This could be attributed to the fact that women that had children will likely give consent to removal of their uterus while nulliparous women will likely want to retain their uterus even in the face of advanced pathology with the hope of bearing children in the future.
The most common indication for elective abdominal hysterectomy in this study was symptomatic uterine fibroid. This was the finding in similar studies from other centers.,, This may probably be because uterine fibroid is the most common benign genital tract tumor among women of African and Caribbean origin. The indications for hysterectomy in nulliparous women in this study were mainly uncontrollable hemorrhage during attempt at myomectomy and endometrial hyperplasia.
TAH was the most frequently performed operation. This is in keeping with findings from other centers., This is because subtotal hysterectomy is not favored except at cesarean hysterectomy, and also, it is unpopular in our environment because of the risk of cancer of the cervical stump. However, subtotal hysterectomy was done for 11 patients (7.0%). This was due to uncontrollable hemorrhage during myomectomy or dense adhesions in the pelvis.
Majority of the elective abdominal hysterectomy was performed by consultants probably because all the cases were elective.
Postoperative pyrexia was the most common morbidity in this study; this is consistent with findings from other centers., Wound infection was probably due to poor aseptic conditions that prevail in developing countries. In this review, there were two cases (2.4%) of ureteric injuries. Although these cases were managed successfully, it is recommended that ureters are properly delineated, and in difficult cases, stenting by the urologist before surgery. There was no mortality associated with hysterectomy during the years under review.
Length of stay in the hospital was 6–10 days in majority of the patients, which agrees with the findings of Omokanye et al. The 1.3% of cases who stayed beyond 16 days was as a result of complications related to surgery or the initial pathology they had.
| Conclusion|| |
Elective abdominal hysterectomy is a fairly common and safe procedure in AKTH. Uterine fibroid was the most common indication for the procedure while postoperative pyrexia was the most frequent complication of the procedure. TAH was commonly performed compared to subtotal hysterectomy.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Dutta DC. Operative gynaecology. In: Konar H, editor. Dutta's Textbook of Gynaecology. 5th
ed. Calcutta: New Central Book Agency Ltd. Chintamoni Das Lane Kolkota; 2009. p. 552-90.
Howard WJ. Abdominal hysterectomy. In: John AR, Howard WR, editor. Te Linde's Operative Gynecology. 10th
ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008. p. 727-33.
Umeora OU, Onuh RC, Eze JN, Igberase GO. Abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy: Appraisal of indications and complications in a Nigerian federal medical center. Nepal J of Obstet Gynaecol 2009;4:25-9.
Vessey MP, Villard-Mackintosh L, McPherson K, Coulter A, Yeates D. The epidemiology of hysterectomy: Findings in a large cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:402-7.
Arowojolu AO. Hysterectomy. In: Okonofua F, Odunsi K, editor. Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Developing Countries. 1st
ed. Benin City: Women's Health and Action Research Center; 2003. p. 227-42.
Omokanye LO, Saidu R, Aboyeji PA, Balogun OR, Ijaiya MA, Jimoh AA. Hysterectomy at the university of Ilorin teaching hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria: A ten year review. Nig Med Pract 2012;61:104-8.S.
Obilali A, Ibrahim IA, Omoregie O. Hysterectomy in the Niger-Delta of Nigeria: A clinical study of indications and outcome. Greener J Med Sci 2013;3:160-5.
Omole-Ohonsi A, Ashimi OA. Non-emergency hysterectomy: Why the aversion? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;280:953-9.
Okafor CI, Ukanwa U, Nwankwo ME, Ezeigwe CO. A review of gynaecological hysterectomies in a private specialist hospital in Nigeria. Orient J Med 2012;24:53-7.
Onwuhafua PI, Oguntayo A, AdesiyunG, Obineche I, Akuse JT. Audit of hysterectomies in a group of private hospital in Kaduna city, Northern Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;22:16-20.
Roberts OA, Okunlola MA. Abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynaecolgical conditions at Ibadan, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;18:19-23.
Olatinwo AW, Ofiong RA. An analysis of surgically treated cases of uterine fibroid at the university of Ilorin teaching hospital, Nigeria. Nig J Surg Res 2000;2:6-11.
Onah HE, Ugona MC. An audit of vaginal hysterectomy in Enugu, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;21:58-60.
Jain SB, Chandrakar KD. Non-decent vaginal hysterectomy in rural setup of MP: A Poor acceptance. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2016;66:499-504.
Phipps JH, John M, Nayak S. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:698-700.
Domingo S, Pellicer A. Overview of current trends in hysterectomy. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009;4:673-85.
Shiota M, Kotani Y, Umemoto M, Tobiume T, Shimaoka M, Hoshiai H, et al.
Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 2011;4:161-5.
Daru P, Magaji A, Nyango D, Karshima J, Pam I, Shambe I, et al.
Vaginal hysterectomy at Jos University teaching hospital, Jos, Nigeria. J West Afr Coll Surg 2011;1:26-36.
Wieslander CK, Wong KS. Therapeutic gynecologic procedures. In: Decherney AH, Nathan L, Laufer N, Roman AS, editors. Current Diagnosis and Treatment Obstetrics and Gynecology. 11th
ed. United States: McGraw Hill Companies; 2013. p. 769-92.
Kawuwa MB, Mairiga AG, Audu BM. Indications and complications of hysterectomy in Maiduguri, North Eastern Nigeria. Kanem J Med Sci 2007;1:20-5.
Machado LS. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: Incidence, indications, risk factors and outcome. N
Am J Med Sci 2011;3:358-61.
Gaym A. Elective hysterectomy at Tikur Anbessa teaching hospital, Addis Ababa. Ethiop Med J 2002;40:217-26.
Obiechina NJ, Ugboaja JO, Onyegbule OA, Eleje GU. Vaginal hysterectomy in a Nigerian tertiary health facility. Niger J Med 2010;19:324-5.
Shafi MI. Premalignant and malignant diseases of the cervix. In: Edmonds, editor. Dewhurst's Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 8th
ed. UK: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2012. p. 742-59.
Luoto R, Raitanen J, Pukkala E, Anttila A. Effect of hysterectomy on incidence trends of endometrial and cervical cancer in Finland 1953-2010. Br J Cancer 2004;90:1756-9.
Anzaku AS, Musa J. Total abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions at a University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Niger J Med 2012;21:326-30.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]